Skip to Content
  • Report
  • Pensions
  • Decisions, Decisions: Retirement Plan Choices for Public Employees and Employers

    Sep 1, 2011

    Piggybank on a table.

    A new research analysis finds that defined benefit (DB) pension plans are strongly preferred over 401(k)-type defined contribution (DC) individual accounts.

    The study analyzes seven state retirement systems that offer a choice between DB and DC plans to find that the DB uptake rate ranges from 98 to 75 percent. The percentage of new employees choosing DC plans ranges from 2 to 25 percent for the plans studied.

    In recent years, a few states have offered public employees a choice between primary DB and DC plans. The new study, Decisions, Decisions: Retirement Plan Choices for Public Employees and Employers, analyzes the choices made by employees and finds that:

    • When given the choice between a primary DB or DC plan, public employees overwhelmingly choose the DB pension plan.
    • DB pensions are more cost efficient than DC accounts due to higher investment returns and longevity risk pooling.
    • DC accounts lack supplemental benefits such as death and disability protection. These can still be provided, but require extra contributions outside the DC plan which are therefore not deposited into the members’ accounts.
    • When states look at shifting from a DB pension to DC accounts, such a shift does not close funding shortfalls and can increase retirement costs.
    • A “hybrid” plan for new employees in Utah provides a unique case study in that it has capped the pension funding risk to the employer and shifted risk to employees.

    The seven plans offering DB and DC choice that were analyzed for the study include Colorado Public Employees’ Retirement Association, Florida Retirement System, Montana Public Employee Retirement Administration, North Dakota Public Employees Retirement System, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, and South Carolina Retirement Systems.

    The report is co-authored by Mark Olleman, consulting actuary and principal with Milliman, Inc. and Ilana Boivie, NIRS economist and director of programs.

    Related Research and Analysis

    Debunking the Job-Hopping Myth: A Data-Driven Look at Tenure and Turnover Among Younger Workers
    Business team at morning briefing in the office
  • Issue Brief
  • Generations
  • Debunking the Job-Hopping Myth: A Data-Driven Look at Tenure and Turnover Among Younger Workers

    Contrary to popular belief that Millennials and Generation Z employees are constantly switching jobs, new research from the National Institute on Retirement Security finds that younger workers today show job retention patterns that closely mirror previous generations at the same stage of their careers.

    Sep 2, 2025

    Pensionomics 2025: Measuring the Economic Impact of Defined Benefit Pension Expenditures
    Close-up on a customer making a contactless payment at the supermarket

    Pensionomics 2025: Measuring the Economic Impact of Defined Benefit Pension Expenditures

    Pensionomics 2025: Measuring the Economic Impact of Defined Benefit Pension Expenditures finds pending powered by U.S. private and public sector defined benefit pensions contributed significantly to the economy. In 2022, retiree spending of public and private sector pension benefits generated $1.5 trillion in total economic output, supporting 7.1 million jobs across the nation.

    Jan 5, 2025

    Public Retirement System State Fact Sheets
    A map of the contiguous 48 U.S. states
  • Fact Sheets
  • Pensions
  • Public Retirement System State Fact Sheets

    In partnership with AARP and NRTA, NIRS has developed a series of state-by-state infographic fact sheets regarding the public employee and teacher retirement systems across the country. These fact sheets present a snapshot of these retirement systems along with key data from NIRS research and other sources.

    Jan 1, 2025