The New Reality of Retirement and Workplace Benefits
No Quick Fix: Closing a Public Pension Plan Leads to Unexpected Challenges tracks the experience of five states that shifted new employees away from defined benefit (DB) pensions to defined contribution (DC) or cash balance plans.
Among states that switched to a DC plan, costs rose, negative cash flow grew, and employee turnover increased. Additionally, the retirement security of plan participants in DC plans was negatively impacted because of a high degree of “leakage” of retirement assets from the DC accounts that replaced pension plans.
The states examined in the report are Alaska, Kentucky, Michigan, Oklahoma, and West Virginia.
The report is authored by Dan Doonan, NIRS executive director, Tyler Bond, NIRS research director, and Celia Ringland, NIRS research associate.
The report’s key findings are as follows:
The New Reality of Retirement and Workplace Benefits
The New Reality of Retirement and Workplace Benefits
The Middle-Class Squeeze: What It Means for Retirement Security
The Middle-Class Squeeze: What It Means for Retirement Security
The State That Eliminated Pensions and Wants Them Back
The State That Eliminated Pensions and Wants Them Back
Contrary to popular belief that Millennials and Generation Z employees are constantly switching jobs, new research from the National Institute on Retirement Security finds that younger workers today show job retention patterns that closely mirror previous generations at the same stage of their careers.